Partisan Business Cycle Analysis
Partisan business cycle analysis tests whether left-wing and right-wing governments produce systematically different macroeconomic outcomes. Douglas Hibbs's 1977 partisan theory argued that because left and right parties represent constituencies with different exposures to unemployment and inflation, left governments durably push for lower unemployment while tolerating higher inflation, and right governments do the reverse. Alberto Alesina's 1987 rational partisan theory added rational expectations and nominal wage contracts: when parties differ and election outcomes are uncertain, the surprise of who wins generates only a transitory burst of partisan divergence in output and employment, which fades once contracts adjust. The empirical method regresses macroeconomic series on a partisan government indicator and post-election dummies to distinguish permanent from transitory effects.
Leer el método completo
Inicia sesión con una cuenta gratuita para leer esta sección.
Mapa de métodos
El vecindario de métodos relacionados: selecciona un nodo para explorarlo.
Fuentes
- Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467-1487. DOI: 10.2307/1961490 ↗
- Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 651-678. DOI: 10.2307/1884222 ↗
Cómo citar esta página
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Partisan Theory of Macroeconomic Policy and Business Cycles. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/es/political-economy/partisan-business-cycle-analysis
¿Qué método?
Coloca este método junto a sus parientes más cercanos y léelos lado a lado: la biblioteca pone los libros sobre la mesa; la elección es tuya.
- Central Bank Independence IndexPolitical Economy↔ comparar
- Economic Voting AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ comparar
- Political Budget Cycle AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ comparar
Citado por
Métodos similares
Conceptos de referencia relacionados
¿Has visto un problema en esta página? Infórmanos o sugiere una corrección →