Registro de evidencia del método

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Registro de origen

Citas copiadas textualmente del registro de origen del método. No se infiere ninguna verificación a nivel de afirmación de ellas.

Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)

Registro del método taxonómico · process-pipeline / science-technology-studies

Abrir método completo

Afirmaciones curadas

Afirmaciones persistidas en el libro mayor de evidencia, cada una con su propia evaluación.

Aún no hay afirmaciones curadas

Esta vista no inventa una evaluación de afirmación si el libro mayor no tiene ninguna.

Métodos relacionados

Generado a partir del grafo de métodos y mostrado como relaciones sugeridas por la máquina; no se infiere ninguna afirmación de evidencia.

Same method familyActor-Network Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoundary-Work Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySocial Construction of Technologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySociotechnical Imaginaries Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.