Comparar métodos

	Ensamble de votación	Potenciación
Campo	Aprendizaje automático	Aprendizaje automático
Familia	Machine learning	Machine learning
Año de origen	1990s–2004	1990–1997
Autor original	Lam & Suen; Kuncheva, L. I. (systematic treatment)	Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y.
Tipo	Ensemble (combination of multiple classifiers by vote)	Sequential ensemble (iterative reweighting)
Fuente seminal	Kuncheva, L. I. (2004). Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0-471-21078-8	Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139.
Alias	majority voting classifier, hard voting, soft voting ensemble, plurality voting ensemble	AdaBoost, gradient boosting, iterative reweighting ensemble, sequential ensemble
Relacionados	5	6
Resumen	A voting ensemble trains several diverse classifiers independently and combines their predictions by a vote: hard voting picks the class chosen by the most models, while soft voting averages their class-probability estimates, optionally with per-model weights. The combination usually outperforms any individual member, and requires no additional training after the base models are fitted.	Boosting is a sequential ensemble technique that converts many simple, barely-better-than-chance learners into a single highly accurate model by repeatedly focusing training on the examples that previous learners got wrong, then combining all learners with weights proportional to their individual accuracy.