Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| UTA*× | Método de ponderación objetiva CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Toma de decisiones | Toma de decisiones |
| Familia | MCDM | MCDM |
| Año de origen≠ | 1985 | 2016 |
| Autor original≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. |
| Tipo≠ | Additive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgements | Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based) |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumen≠ | UTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|