Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| UTA*× | Proceso Analítico en Red (AHP con retroalimentación e interdependencias)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Toma de decisiones | Toma de decisiones |
| Familia | MCDM | MCDM |
| Año de origen≠ | 1985 | 1996 |
| Autor original≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tipo≠ | Additive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgements | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumen≠ | UTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|