Comparar métodos

	Revisión de Mapeo por Segmentos Temporales	Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura
Campo	Cienciometría	Cienciometría
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	2000s–2010s	1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
Autor original	Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas	Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
Tipo	Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation	Evidence synthesis methodology
Fuente seminal	Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842	Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401.
Alias	temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review	SLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
Relacionados	6	5
Resumen	A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.	A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.