Comparar métodos

	Revisión de Mapeo por Segmentos Temporales	Análisis Bibliométrico
Campo	Cienciometría	Cienciometría
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	2000s–2010s	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Autor original	Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Tipo	Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation	Quantitative literature analysis
Fuente seminal	Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Alias	temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Relacionados	6	6
Resumen	A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.