Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis bibliométrico por cortes temporales× | Análisis Bibliométrico× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Cienciometría | Cienciometría |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2000s–2010s (as an explicit methodological variant) | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| Autor original≠ | Derived from classical bibliometrics (Price, Garfield); explicitly formalised in longitudinal studies by Zhao & Strotmann (2008) and others | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| Tipo≠ | Quantitative scientometric analysis | Quantitative literature analysis |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086. DOI ↗ | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| Alias | longitudinal bibliometrics, temporal bibliometric analysis, diachronic bibliometrics, time-window bibliometric analysis | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Time-sliced bibliometric analysis partitions a literature corpus into consecutive time windows and applies standard bibliometric indicators (publication counts, citation patterns, co-authorship networks, keyword frequencies) within each window. By comparing results across slices, researchers can document how a field's productivity, intellectual structure, and thematic focus have shifted over time — providing a diachronic rather than static view of scholarly output. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|