Comparar métodos

	Crítica textual	Investigación Histórica de Archivos
Campo	Métodos de campo	Métodos de campo
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	Antiquity; modern systematic method c. 1850s (Lachmann)	19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s)
Autor original	Classical philologists (Karl Lachmann foremost in systematic method)	Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century
Tipo	Humanistic / philological research method	Qualitative primary-source research
Fuente seminal	West, M. L. (1973). Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts. Teubner. ISBN: 978-3519074014	Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853
Alias	lower criticism, editorial criticism, philological criticism, manuscript criticism	archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research
Relacionados	5	6
Resumen	Textual criticism is a systematic philological method for identifying, comparing, and evaluating variant readings across multiple manuscript or print witnesses of a text in order to reconstruct the most accurate version of the original — or the author's intended — text. Applied since antiquity to classical, biblical, and literary works, it remains the foundational editorial method in classical studies, biblical scholarship, medieval studies, and critical editing of literary works.	Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines.