Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis× | Actor-Network Theory Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2009 | 1984 |
| Autor original≠ | Sheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim | Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative interpretive and comparative method | Material-semiotic theory and analytic method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI ↗ | Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051 |
| Alias | Sociotechnical imaginary analysis, Imaginaries of science and technology, Visions of desirable futures analysis | ANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Sociotechnical imaginaries analysis studies the collectively held, institutionally stabilised, and publicly performed visions of desirable futures that societies attach to science and technology. Introduced by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim in their 2009 comparison of nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, the concept treats imaginaries as more than rhetoric: they are co-produced with the material and political order, shaping how technologies are designed, governed, and lived. The method reconstructs these visions from public discourse, traces how they become embedded in institutions and policy, and compares how the same technology animates different imaginaries across nations or eras. | Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|