ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Experimento natural ciego simple×Ensayo controlado aleatorizado simple ciego×
CampoDiseño experimentalDiseño experimental
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origenLate 20th century (formalized practice)1948 (formalized); single-blind variant established in mid-20th century clinical trial methodology
Autor originalConceptual synthesis of natural experiment tradition (Haavelmo, 1944; Campbell & Stanley, 1963) with single-blind methodologyBradford Hill and colleagues (MRC streptomycin trial, 1948); blinding conventions codified in CONSORT guidelines
TipoQuasi-experimental design with partial blindingExperimental design — blinded randomized trial
Fuente seminalDunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1107698000Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
Aliassingle-masked natural experiment, blinded quasi-experiment, single-blind exogenous assignment studysingle-masked RCT, single-blind RCT, single-blind trial, SB-RCT
Relacionados25
ResumenA single-blind natural experiment leverages an exogenous, researcher-uncontrolled event — such as a policy change, lottery, or natural disaster — to create treatment and comparison groups, while applying single-blind procedures so that either the participants or the outcome assessors (but not both) are unaware of group assignment. This design combines the causal leverage of natural variation with reduced measurement bias from blinding.A single-blind randomized controlled trial (SB-RCT) is a rigorous experimental design in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions while remaining unaware of which condition they have received. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts are not blinded. By masking participants, the design eliminates placebo and nocebo response biases on the participant side, while preserving investigator flexibility to administer and monitor the intervention.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Single-blind Natural Experiment · Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare