Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Investigación de contraste de hipótesis asistida por simulación× | Análisis de potencia× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Diseño de investigación | Estadística |
| Familia≠ | Process / pipeline | Hypothesis test |
| Año de origen≠ | 1980s–1990s (bootstrap: 1979; permutation inference: mid-20th century; unified simulation-assisted framing: 1990s–2000s) | 1969 (1st ed.); 1988 (seminal 2nd ed.) |
| Autor original≠ | Bradley Efron (bootstrap framework); Phillip Good (permutation tests); Monte Carlo tradition traced to Stanislaw Ulam and John von Neumann | Jacob Cohen |
| Tipo≠ | Quantitative research design integrating computational simulation with classical hypothesis testing | Sample size and power planning |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978-0412042317 | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832 |
| Alias | simulation-based hypothesis testing, Monte Carlo hypothesis testing, computational hypothesis testing, simulation-assisted inference | sample size calculation, power calculation, sensitivity analysis, a priori power analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Resumen≠ | Simulation-assisted hypothesis testing research replaces or supplements analytical probability theory with computational simulation — resampling, permutation, or Monte Carlo methods — to construct null distributions and evaluate hypotheses. Rather than assuming a parametric distribution and consulting a table, the researcher generates thousands of simulated datasets from the observed data or a specified model, building an empirical null distribution against which the observed test statistic is compared. The approach is especially valuable when analytic assumptions (normality, large samples) cannot be met. | Power analysis is a planning and evaluation technique that quantifies the probability of detecting a real effect of a given magnitude at a chosen significance level. It links four quantities — sample size, effect size, significance level (alpha), and statistical power (1 minus beta) — so that researchers can determine the sample size needed before data collection or evaluate the sensitivity of a completed study. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|