Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Validez de contenido de forma corta× | Desarrollo de escalas cortas× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Psicometría | Psicometría |
| Familia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Año de origen≠ | 1995–2000 | 1990s–2000s |
| Autor original≠ | Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards) | Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002) |
| Tipo≠ | Validity evaluation | Scale development methodology |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms | scale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodology |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Resumen≠ | Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover. | Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|