Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Método del Rango de Valores× | Proceso Analítico en Red (AHP con retroalimentación e interdependencias)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Toma de decisiones | Toma de decisiones |
| Familia | MCDM | MCDM |
| Año de origen≠ | 1993 | 1996 |
| Autor original≠ | Yakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., Szidarovszky, F. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tipo≠ | Interval utility (optimistic–pessimistic bounds) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Yakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., Szidarovszky, F. (1993). Multi-attribute decision making: Dominance with respect to an importance order of the attributes. Applied Mathematics and Computation DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumen≠ | ROV (Range of Value method) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., Szidarovszky, F. in 1993. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|