ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Emparejamiento Robusto por Puntuación de Propensión×Ponderación por Probabilidad Inversa de Tratamiento (IPW / IPTW)×
CampoInferencia causalInferencia causal
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations)2000
Autor originalAbadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundationsRobins, Hernán & Brumback
TipoQuasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inferenceCausal inference weighting estimator
Fuente seminalAbadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
Aliasrobust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inferenceIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Relacionados65
ResumenRobust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Robust Propensity Score Matching · Inverse Probability Weighting. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare