ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Estudio epidemiológico retrospectivo de corte transversal×Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo×
CampoEpidemiologíaEpidemiología
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origenMid–late 20th centuryMid-20th century (widely formalized 1950s–1970s)
Autor originalEpidemiology tradition (formalized in mid-20th century; Rothman, Greenland and others)Systematic use attributed to early 20th-century occupational epidemiology; formalized in modern epidemiological theory by Brian MacMahon and others
TipoObservational study designObservational analytic study
Fuente seminalRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Aliasretrospective cross-sectional survey, record-based cross-sectional study, retrospective prevalence study, secondary-data cross-sectional studyhistorical cohort study, non-concurrent cohort study, retrospective follow-up study, historical prospective study
Relacionados56
ResumenA retrospective cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the prevalence of exposures and outcomes at a single analytical time point using data that were originally recorded in the past — such as medical records, administrative databases, or disease registries. It combines the snapshot logic of a cross-sectional design with the efficiency of retrospective data access, making it a practical choice when prospective data collection is unfeasible or when large existing datasets are available.A retrospective cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point and reconstructs their exposure history and subsequent outcomes entirely from pre-existing records. Because the data have already been collected before the study begins, the design is far faster and cheaper than a prospective cohort; however, the researcher must work with whatever information was recorded at the time rather than collecting purpose-built measurements.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Retrospective cross-sectional epidemiological study · Retrospective Cohort Study. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare