Comparar métodos

	Meta-inferencia de Métodos Mixtos con Dominancia Cuantitativa	Matriz de Métodos Mixtos
Campo	Diseño de investigación	Diseño de investigación
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	2003–2007	2003–2010
Autor original	Tashakkori & Teddlie (meta-inference concept); Creswell & Plano Clark (dominance weighting framework)	Tashakkori & Teddlie; Onwuegbuzie & Teddlie
Tipo	Mixed methods integration procedure	Research design classification and planning tool
Fuente seminal	Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761920731	Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Sage.
Alias	QUAN-dominant meta-inference, quantitatively weighted meta-inference, QUAN-priority integration inference, quantitative-weighted mixed inference	MMR matrix, mixed-methods design matrix, research design classification matrix, mixed methods typology matrix
Relacionados	6	6
Resumen	Quantitative-dominant mixed methods meta-inference is an integration procedure in which the researcher draws an overarching conclusion by combining inferences from both quantitative and qualitative strands, while explicitly assigning greater evidential weight to the quantitative results. The qualitative strand serves a supporting, elaborating, or contextualizing role rather than an equal voice in the final interpretation.	The mixed methods matrix is a systematic framework for classifying, planning, and comparing mixed methods research designs along key dimensions such as timing (concurrent vs. sequential), priority (quantitative- vs. qualitative-dominant), and point of integration. It provides researchers with a structured map to make design decisions explicit, communicate choices transparently, and locate a study within the broader mixed methods typology.