ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Regresión de Supervivencia Prospectiva de Riesgos Proporcionales de Cox×Análisis de Kaplan-Meier×
CampoEpidemiologíaEpidemiología
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen1972 (Cox model); widespread prospective application from late 1970s1958
Autor originalDavid R. Cox (model); applied prospectively in large cohort studies from 1970s onwardEdward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier
TipoSemi-parametric survival regression applied to prospectively collected time-to-event dataNonparametric survival estimator
Fuente seminalCox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
Aliasprospective Cox regression, Cox PH prospective study, prospective survival regression, prospective hazard modelingKM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve
Relacionados45
ResumenProspective Cox proportional hazards regression combines a forward-looking cohort design — in which participants are enrolled before outcomes occur and followed over time — with Cox's semi-parametric survival model. The method estimates how baseline covariates measured at enrollment influence the rate at which participants experience a time-to-event outcome, while preserving the temporal direction required for causal inference. It is one of the most widely used analytical frameworks in clinical epidemiology and chronic disease research.Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Prospective Cox proportional hazards · Kaplan-Meier Analysis. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare