ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Ingeniería de Prompts×Generación Aumentada por Recuperación (RAG)×
CampoMinería de textoMinería de texto
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen2020 (few-shot prompting); 2022 (chain-of-thought)2020
Autor originalTom Brown et al. (GPT-3 / few-shot framing, 2020); chain-of-thought extended by Jason Wei et al. (2022)Lewis, Patrick et al. (Meta AI / Facebook AI Research)
TipoNLP pipeline — structured instruction design for large language modelsHybrid retrieval + generation pipeline
Fuente seminalBrown, T. et al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 1877-1901. link ↗Lewis, P. et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 9459-9474. DOI ↗
Aliasinstruction design, LLM prompting, Yönerge Mühendisliği (Prompt Engineering)RAG, retrieval-augmented LLM, grounded generation, Erişim Destekli Metin Üretimi (RAG)
Relacionados77
ResumenPrompt engineering is the practice of crafting structured natural-language instructions — prompts — to elicit targeted outputs from large language models (LLMs). Formalised by Brown et al. (2020) in the context of GPT-3 and extended by Wei et al. (2022) with chain-of-thought prompting, it encompasses four main strategies: zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and tree-of-thought. Rather than re-training a model, the analyst shapes the model's behaviour entirely through the design of the input text.Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a natural-language-processing pipeline introduced by Lewis et al. in 2020 that strengthens a large language model (LLM) with evidence fetched at inference time from an external knowledge base. Instead of relying solely on what a model memorised during training, RAG first retrieves the most relevant passages from a document index and then hands those passages to the LLM as context, grounding the generated answer in verifiable, up-to-date information. The approach reduces hallucination and allows domain-specific or time-sensitive knowledge to be injected without retraining the model.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Prompt Engineering · Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare