Comparar métodos

	PROMETHEE VI	PROMETHEE II	PROMETHEE I
Campo	Toma de decisiones	Toma de decisiones	Toma de decisiones
Familia	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Año de origen	1995	1986	1986
Autor original	Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B.	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.	Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.
Tipo	Sensitivity analysis of PROMETHEE rankings across all feasible weight combinations	Preference function (net flow)	Outranking via positive/negative flows (partial preorder)
Fuente seminal	Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B. (1995). The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems	Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research	Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research
Alias	—	—	—
Relacionados	2	8	8
Resumen	PROMETHEE-VI (PROMETHEE VI — Walking Weights Sensitivity) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	PROMETHEE-I (PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.