ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

PROMETHEE III×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen19861995
Autor originalBrans, J. P. Vincke, P. Mareschal, B.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipoOutranking via interval flows derived from net-flow mean and dispersionStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Fuente seminalBrans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenPROMETHEE-III (PROMETHEE III — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations III (interval ranking)) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P. Vincke, P. Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PROMETHEE-III · CRITIC. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare