Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Price Elasticity from Scanner Data× | Scanner Panel Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Marketing | Marketing |
| Familia | Regression model | Regression model |
| Año de origen≠ | 1988 | 1983 |
| Autor original≠ | Dick R. Wittink, Peter S. H. Leeflang and colleagues (SCAN*PRO) | Peter M. Guadagni & John D. C. Little |
| Tipo≠ | Multiplicative store-level sales-response regression | Disaggregate multinomial-logit brand-choice model |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Leeflang, P. S. H., Wittink, D. R., Wedel, M., & Naert, P. A. (2000). Building Models for Marketing Decisions. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 9780792377726 | Guadagni, P. M., & Little, J. D. C. (1983). A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203-238. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | SCAN*PRO Model, Store-Level Sales Response Model, Multiplicative Sales Response Model, Promotion Sales-Effect Model | Scanner Panel Logit, Guadagni-Little Model, Household Panel Choice Model, Loyalty-Variable Logit |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Estimating price elasticity from scanner data means fitting a store-level sales-response model to the weekly unit-sales, price, and promotion records that retail checkout scanners generate, in order to recover how sensitive demand is to price. The canonical specification is the SCAN*PRO model developed by Dick Wittink, Peter Leeflang, and colleagues: a multiplicative model in which a brand's unit sales in a store-week are a product of relative-price terms raised to elasticity powers and promotion multipliers for feature and display. Taking logarithms turns this into a linear regression whose price coefficients are directly interpretable as own- and cross-price elasticities, while the promotion coefficients become multiplicative lift factors. Pooled across many stores with store-specific intercepts, the model delivers stable, managerially usable elasticities and quantifies the sales lift from promotions. Later work, such as Van Heerde, Gupta, and Wittink, decomposed the promotional sales bump into brand switching, purchase acceleration, and category expansion, refining the interpretation of what an elasticity captures. It is the standard aggregate demand model in retail analytics. | Scanner panel analysis models individual households' brand choices using the purchase histories captured by UPC scanner panels, in which the same households are tracked occasion by occasion with the brand chosen and the prices and promotions they faced. The defining method is Guadagni and Little's 1983 multinomial logit of brand choice, the first model to put scanner panel data to serious analytical use. Its signal innovation is the loyalty variable: an exponentially smoothed measure of each household's past brand purchases that enters the utility function and captures persistent brand preference and state dependence. Alongside loyalty, the model includes price, promotion, and brand intercepts, and yields the probability that a household buys each brand on a given occasion. From the fitted model one recovers price and promotion elasticities at the individual level and can simulate how marketing actions shift choices. The framework launched the modern era of disaggregate choice modeling and remains the reference point for scanner-based brand-choice analysis. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|