ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Diseño pragmático de métodos mixtos×Diseño multifase de métodos mixtos×
CampoDiseño de investigaciónDiseño de investigación
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origenEarly 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research)
Autor originalJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard RortyJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
TipoMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Fuente seminalCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483substitute
Aliaspragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methodsmultiphase design, multiproject mixed methods, programmatic mixed methods, multistage mixed methods
Relacionados66
ResumenPragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.The multiphase mixed methods design is a sustained research program in which quantitative and qualitative strands are combined across three or more sequential phases — or across multiple related projects — to address a central program objective. Each phase builds on the prior phase's findings, making the design well-suited to long-term evaluation, intervention development, and large-scale program assessment where a single data-collection cycle cannot fully address the complexity of the research problem.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design · Multiphase Mixed Methods Design. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare