ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Serie de casos pragmática×Serie de Casos Retrospectiva×
CampoEpidemiologíaEpidemiología
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origenPragmatic framing formalized 1967; case series practice predates 20th centuryLong-standing practice; codified in EBM frameworks during 1990s–2000s
Autor originalPragmatic framework: Schwartz & Lellouch (1967); case series design: longstanding clinical traditionClinical medicine tradition (no single originator); formalized in evidence-based medicine literature
TipoObservational descriptive studyObservational descriptive study design
Fuente seminalSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Kooistra, B., Dijkman, B., Einhorn, T. A., & Bhandari, M. (2009). How to design a good case series. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 91(Suppl 3), 21–26. DOI ↗
Aliasreal-world case series, pragmatic observational case series, practice-based case seriesretrospective case series, chart review case series, historical case series, medical records case series
Relacionados54
ResumenA pragmatic case series is an observational study that documents consecutive or purposively selected patients receiving a clinical intervention or presenting with a condition under routine, real-world practice conditions — without randomization, a control group, or the highly controlled eligibility criteria characteristic of explanatory trials. It is used to describe treatment patterns, outcomes, and adverse events as they occur in everyday clinical settings.A retrospective case series is an observational study that systematically describes the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of a defined group of patients by examining pre-existing medical records or administrative data. It looks backward in time — data have already been recorded before the study begins. With no control group, no randomization, and no prospective follow-up, it sits near the base of the evidence hierarchy but remains one of the most practical and frequently published study designs in clinical medicine.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Pragmatic case series · Retrospective Case Series. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare