ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Extensión Lingüística Probabilística de TOPSIS×Sistema de Medición del Impacto de Criterios×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20192025
Autor originalLu, J., Wei, C.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
TipoProbabilistic Linguistic outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set (PLTS: {L_k|p_k})Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
Fuente seminalLu, J., Wei, C. (2019). TOPSIS Method for Probabilistic Linguistic MAGDM with Entropy Weight and Its Application to Supplier Selection of New Agricultural Machinery Products. Entropy DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenPL-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Linguistic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Lu, J., Wei, C. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PL-TOPSIS · CIMAS. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare