ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Extensión Lingüística Probabilística de EDAS×Método de ponderación objetiva CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs)×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20162016
Autor originalPang, Q. Wang, H. Xu, Z.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipoProbabilistic Linguistic outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set (PLTS: {L_k|p_k})Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Fuente seminalPang, Q., Wang, H., Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenPL-EDAS (Probabilistic Linguistic extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pang, Q. Wang, H. Xu, Z. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PL-EDAS · CILOS. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare