ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Evaluación de la Importancia Relativa de Criterios por Pares Pivote×Solución de Compromiso Combinada×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20172019
Autor originalStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TipoPivot pairwise sequential ratio weightingAggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
Fuente seminalStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. (2017). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: A new approach to the SWARA method — PIPRECIA. Transformations in Business & Economics link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenPIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PIPRECIA · COCOSO. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare