ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Evaluación de la Importancia Relativa de Criterios por Pares Pivote×AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation)×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20172022
Autor originalStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipoPivot pairwise sequential ratio weightingTwo-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Fuente seminalStanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. (2017). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: A new approach to the SWARA method — PIPRECIA. Transformations in Business & Economics link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenPIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PIPRECIA · AROMAN. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare