ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic EDAS (EHFL-EDAS)×Método de ponderación objetiva CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs)×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20182016
Autor originalFeng, X., Wei, C., Liu, Q.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipoProbabilistic Hesitant outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Fuente seminalFeng, X., Wei, C., Liu, Q. (2018). EDAS Method for Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-criteria Decision Making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88
ResumenPHF-EDAS (Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic EDAS (EHFL-EDAS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Feng, X., Wei, C., Liu, Q. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PHF-EDAS · CILOS. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare