ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Extensión Hesitante Probabilística de COPRAS×Proceso Analítico Jerárquico×Proceso Analítico en Red (AHP con retroalimentación e interdependencias)×Método Best-Worst×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisionesToma de decisionesToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20211980199620151995
Autor originalSong, H. F. Chen, Z. C.Saaty, T. L.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipoProbabilistic Hesitant ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Fuente seminalSong, H. F., Chen, Z. C. (2021). Multi-attribute decision-making method based distance and COPRAS method with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88888
ResumenPHF-COPRAS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, H. F. Chen, Z. C. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PHF-COPRAS · AHP · ANP · BWM · CRITIC. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare