Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Participatory Video× | Community Scorecard× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2006 | 2002 |
| Autor original≠ | Don Snowden (Fogo process, 1960s); codified by Nick and Chris Lunch (InsightShare) and Shirley White | CARE Malawi (developed within the social accountability movement); disseminated by the World Bank |
| Tipo≠ | Participatory visual research and communication method | Community-based social accountability monitoring tool |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Lunch, N., & Lunch, C. (2006). Insights into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field. Oxford: InsightShare. ISBN: 9782940290086 | CARE (2013). The Community Score Card (CSC): A Generic Guide for Implementing CARE's CSC Process to Improve Quality of Services. Atlanta: CARE. link ↗ |
| Alias | PV, Community Video, Video for Development, Participatory Filmmaking | CSC, Community Score Card, Community-Based Scorecard, Community Performance Scorecard |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Participatory Video (PV) is a set of techniques through which a group or community creates its own films to explore issues, voice concerns, communicate with each other, and advocate to outsiders. Rooted in the 1960s Fogo Island process and codified for development practice by Nick and Chris Lunch of InsightShare and by Shirley White, PV treats the camera not as the property of an outside researcher but as a tool placed in the hands of community members, so that the process of making the video — as much as the film itself — builds confidence, analysis, and collective agency. | The Community Scorecard (CSC) is a participatory social-accountability tool for community-based monitoring of public services, in which both the users and the providers of a service rate its performance and then meet face to face to agree improvements. Developed by CARE in Malawi in the early 2000s and widely disseminated by the World Bank, it operates at the local facility level — a clinic, school, or water point — and is qualitative and dialogue-driven, generating immediate, actionable feedback rather than statistically representative ratings. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|