Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Método de Historia Oral Participativa× | Método de Historia Oral× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1970s–1990s (community oral history movement formalized) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Autor original≠ | Influenced by Alessandro Portelli, Sherna Berger Gluck, Paul Thompson, and development-oriented oral historians | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative participatory research | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Slim, H., & Thompson, P. (1993). Listening for a Change: Oral Testimony and Community Development. Panos Institute. link ↗ | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Alias | community oral history, collaborative oral history, participatory oral history, community-based oral history | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Participatory oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which community members are not merely interview subjects but active co-investigators who help shape the research questions, conduct or co-conduct interviews, analyze narratives, and govern how the resulting record is used. Rooted in both the oral history tradition and participatory action research, it foregrounds community ownership, reciprocity, and the democratic production of historical knowledge from marginalized or underrepresented voices. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|