ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Análisis Participativo de la Conversación×Análisis del Discurso×
CampoCualitativaInvestigación cualitativa
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen2000s–2010s (building on CA foundations from the 1960s–1970s)1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
Autor originalDeveloped from Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson's Conversation Analysis tradition; participatory variant emerged in applied and practitioner research contexts in the 2000s–2010sNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
TipoQualitative research methodMethod
Fuente seminalLee, E., & Howes, C. (2020). Conversation analysis as a creative research methodology. Early Child Development and Care, 190(2), 1–14. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
AliasPCA, collaborative conversation analysis, practitioner-involved CA, participatory CADA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
Relacionados42
ResumenParticipatory Conversation Analysis (PCA) extends classical Conversation Analysis by actively involving the people whose talk is being studied in the analytical process. Rather than treating analysis as the researcher's exclusive domain, PCA invites practitioners, community members, or research participants to co-review recordings or transcripts of their own interaction, contribute insider meanings, and collaboratively refine the interpretation of interactional patterns. The approach is widely used in education, healthcare communication, and professional learning contexts.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Participatory Conversation Analysis · Discourse Analysis. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare