Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Observación Participante× | Criterios de Confiabilidad en Investigación Cualitativa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Investigación cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1922 | 1985 |
| Autor original≠ | Bronislaw Malinowski | Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba |
| Tipo≠ | Method | Framework |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432 | Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314 |
| Alias≠ | ethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observation | trustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Participant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact. | Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|