Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis Cienciométrico Basado en Redes× | Análisis Cienciométrico× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Cienciometría | Cienciometría |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s | 1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work) |
| Autor original≠ | Derek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping) | V. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods) |
| Tipo≠ | Quantitative bibliometric method | Quantitative literature analysis |
| Fuente seminal≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka. link ↗ |
| Alias | scientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mapping | scientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysis |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Network-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used. | Scientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|