Comparar métodos

	Análisis de cocitación basado en redes	Análisis Bibliométrico
Campo	Cienciometría	Cienciometría
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	1973 (co-citation); network-analytic extension widely adopted 2000s–2010s	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Autor original	Henry Small (co-citation foundation); network visualization extended by Chaomei Chen and others	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Tipo	Bibliometric network analysis	Quantitative literature analysis
Fuente seminal	Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Alias	co-citation network analysis, bibliometric network co-citation, co-citation mapping, CCA network approach	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Relacionados	6	6
Resumen	Network-based co-citation analysis is a bibliometric technique that measures how often pairs of documents are cited together by later works, then models those relationships as a weighted network. Nodes represent documents (or authors or journals), edges represent co-citation frequency, and network algorithms identify clusters of intellectually related literature. It is widely used in systematic and scoping reviews to map the intellectual structure of a research field.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.