Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Diseño de estudio de casos múltiples× | Teoría Fundamentada× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995) | 1967 |
| Autor original≠ | Robert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | comparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|