Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Historia oral de casos múltiples× | Historia Oral× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Cualitativa | Cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1970s–1990s (convergence of oral history and case study traditions) | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Autor original≠ | Alessandro Portelli (oral history theory); Robert K. Yin (multiple case logic) | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative multi-case research design | Qualitative research method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Portelli, A. (1997). The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN: 978-0299153045 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Alias | multi-case oral history, comparative oral history, cross-case oral history, multi-site oral history | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Multiple case-based oral history is a qualitative research design that embeds oral history interviews within a multiple-case framework. Rather than collecting testimonies from a single community or site, the researcher deliberately selects two or more distinct cases — communities, cohorts, organisations, or geographic sites — gathers in-depth oral testimonies within each, and then conducts systematic cross-case comparison to identify both shared and divergent historical experiences. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|