Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis Metáforico Basado en Múltiples Casos× | Análisis Temático× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | 2006 |
| Autor original≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|