Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Observación no participante multifuente× | Recopilación de Documentos× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Metodología de encuestas | Metodología de encuestas |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1970s–1980s (methodological triangulation literature) | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| Autor original≠ | Rooted in systematic observation traditions; multi-source triangulation formalised by Norman Denzin | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative/naturalistic data collection strategy | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | multi-site non-participant observation, multi-context unobtrusive observation, non-reactive multi-source observation, triangulated non-participant observation | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Multi-source non-participant observation is a qualitative data collection strategy in which a researcher systematically observes naturally occurring behaviour across two or more distinct settings, sites, or data sources without joining or influencing the activity being studied. By deliberately excluding the researcher from participation and drawing on multiple independent observational vantage points, the approach strengthens credibility through methodological triangulation while preserving the unobtrusiveness that protects naturalistic behaviour. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|