Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Fiabilidad Test-Retest Multigrupo× | Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio (AFC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Psicometría | Psicometría |
| Familia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Año de origen≠ | 1979–2000 | 1969 |
| Autor original≠ | Systematic multi-group extensions developed alongside measurement invariance frameworks (Vandenberg & Lance, 2000); intraclass correlation foundation in Shrout & Fleiss (1979) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Tipo≠ | Reliability estimation across groups | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | multi-group temporal stability, cross-group test-retest reliability, group-comparative retest reliability, multi-sample temporal consistency | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Resumen≠ | Multi-group test-retest reliability evaluates whether a measure produces stable scores across time separately for two or more defined groups — such as different genders, age cohorts, or clinical populations — and determines whether the degree of that temporal stability is equivalent across those groups. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|