ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

MSFC: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite×RMI: Índice de Movilidad de Rivermead×
CampoNeurologíaNeurología
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Año de origen19991991
Autor originalGary Cutter, Richard Rudick, and NMSS ConsortiumFrank Collen, Derick Wade, and Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre
TipoClinician-administered performance testClinician-observed performance test
Fuente seminalCutter, G. R., Baier, M. L., Rudick, R. A., et al. (1999). Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Multiple Sclerosis, 5(4), 244-250. DOI ↗Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., Bradshaw, C. M. (1991). The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. International Disability Studies, 13(2), 50-54. DOI ↗
AliasMS Functional CompositeRivermead Mobility Index
Relacionados45
ResumenThe Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is an objective, performance-based assessment of MS-related disability capturing three key functional domains: lower extremity mobility, upper extremity coordination, and cognitive/processing speed. Developed in 1999 by the National MS Society and adopted widely in clinical trials, the MSFC provides quantifiable endpoints complementing the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The three-component design addresses EDSS limitations by including cognition and standardizing measurement via timed tasks.The Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is a brief, clinician-observed performance test of basic mobility abilities developed for assessing stroke and neurological rehabilitation outcomes. Published in 1991 by Frank Collen and colleagues at Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre (Oxford, UK), the 15-item index measures bed mobility, sitting/standing balance, transfers, and ambulation. The RMI is widely used in stroke units and rehabilitation settings to track functional recovery and predict discharge outcomes.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: MSFC · RMI. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare