ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

MPF-TOPSIS-LING×Proceso Analítico Jerárquico×Proceso Analítico en Red (AHP con retroalimentación e interdependencias)×Método Best-Worst×BWM-BAYESIAN (Método Bayesiano de Mejor-Peor para Grupos×
CampoToma de decisionesToma de decisionesToma de decisionesToma de decisionesToma de decisiones
FamiliaMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Año de origen20191980199620152020
Autor originalAdeel, A., Akram, M., Koam, A. N. A.Saaty, T. L.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J.
TipoDistance-based group-decision MCDM under m-polar fuzzy linguistic information — aggregated m-PF linguistic decision matrix d'^i_jk = (1/r) Σ_l d^l,i_jk, weighted matrix e^i_jk = w'_k d^i_jk, m-PF linguistic Euclidean distances (Eqs. 3–4) to mPIS / mNIS (Eqs. 1–2), closeness coefficient E'_j (Eq. 5) descending rankingPairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPHierarchical Dirichlet posterior over weights via MCMC (JAGS) — group decision
Fuente seminalAdeel, A., Akram, M., Koam, A. N. A. (2019). Group Decision-Making Based on m-Polar Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method. Symmetry (MDPI) DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega DOI ↗
Alias
Relacionados88888
ResumenMPF-TOPSIS-LING (m-Polar Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS for MCGDM (Adeel, Akram & Koam 2019, Symmetry 11(6):735) — multi-criteria group decision-making via m-polar fuzzy linguistic variables (mFLV), expert-aggregated m-PF linguistic decision matrix, aggregated linguistic-term-set weights, m-PF linguistic positive/negative ideal solutions (mPIS / mNIS), m-PF linguistic Euclidean distances, relative closeness coefficient E'_j descending ranking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Adeel, A., Akram, M., Koam, A. N. A. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternativeAHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM-BAYESIAN (Bayesian BWM — Probabilistic Group Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: MPF-TOPSIS-LING · AHP · ANP · BWM · BWM-BAYESIAN. Recuperado el 2026-06-20 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare