ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Análisis de modularidad×Centralidad de intermediación×
CampoAnálisis de redesAnálisis de redes
FamiliaMachine learningMachine learning
Año de origen20041977
Autor originalNewman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M.Freeman, L. C.
TipoCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
Fuente seminalNewman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
AliasQ-modularity, community structure detection, network modularity optimization, graph partitioning by modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Relacionados56
ResumenModularity analysis is a network science method, formalized by Newman and Girvan in 2004, that detects community structure in graphs by measuring whether edges are more concentrated within groups than expected by chance. Its scalar quality index Q guides algorithms that partition nodes into cohesive clusters, making it the most widely adopted framework for community detection in social, biological, and technological networks.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Recuperado el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare