Comparar métodos

	Missing Women Estimation	Gender Inequality Index
Campo	Gender Studies	Gender Studies
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	1990	2010
Autor original	Amartya Sen	UNDP Human Development Report Office (Gaye, Klugman et al.)
Tipo	Demographic accounting estimate	Composite inequality index
Fuente seminal	Sen, A. (1992). Missing women. BMJ, 304(6827), 587–588.	Gaye, A., Klugman, J., Kovacevic, M., Twigg, S., & Zambrano, E. (2010). Measuring key disparities in human development: The Gender Inequality Index. Human Development Research Paper 2010/46. UNDP Human Development Report Office.
Alias	Missing Women, Excess Female Mortality Estimation, Sen Missing Women Method	GII, UNDP Gender Inequality Index
Relacionados	2	4
Resumen	Missing women estimation quantifies the number of women and girls who are absent from a population because of gender bias in mortality and, in some settings, sex-selective abortion. Introduced by economist Amartya Sen in 1990 and 1992, the method compares the observed female population (or female deaths) with the number expected under a benchmark sex ratio that would prevail absent discrimination. The resulting deficit — famously estimated at more than 100 million worldwide — is a stark demographic measure of cumulative anti-female bias.	The Gender Inequality Index (GII) is a composite measure introduced by the UNDP in the 2010 Human Development Report to capture the loss in potential human development due to inequality between women and men. It combines three dimensions — reproductive health, empowerment, and labour-market participation — into a single index ranging from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (complete inequality), using an association-sensitive aggregation that penalises both gaps between the sexes and inequality across dimensions.