Comparar métodos

	Revisión Rápida Basada en Meta-Regresión	Revisión exploratoria
Campo	Cienciometría	Cienciometría
Familia	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Año de origen	2000s–2010s (convergence of rapid review and meta-regression)	2005
Autor original	Meta-regression: Simon Thompson & Stephen Sharp (1999); Rapid review methodology: Cochrane, WHO, and health technology assessment bodies (2000s onward)	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Tipo	Quantitative evidence synthesis variant	Evidence synthesis review design
Fuente seminal	Thompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18(20), 2693–2708.	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Alias	rapid review with meta-regression, accelerated meta-regression review, rapid synthesis with meta-regression, RRMR	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Relacionados	5	6
Resumen	A meta-regression-based rapid review is an accelerated evidence synthesis that combines the time-efficient protocols of a rapid review with meta-regression analysis to identify which study-level or population-level characteristics explain variability in effect sizes across included studies. By streamlining search and screening steps without sacrificing the explanatory power of regression modeling, this approach delivers actionable heterogeneity insights under decision-making time constraints.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.