Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis Crítico del Discurso Longitudinal× | Análisis del Discurso× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1990s–2000s (CDA foundations ~1989–1992; longitudinal applications consolidated through 2000s) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Autor original≠ | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative longitudinal discourse design | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612690 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Longitudinal CDA, diachronic critical discourse analysis, longitudinal discourse study, temporal CDA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Resumen≠ | Longitudinal Critical Discourse Analysis (LCDA) combines the critical discourse analysis tradition — which examines how language constructs and reproduces power, ideology, and social inequality — with a longitudinal design that collects and compares texts at multiple time points. By tracking discursive change over time, LCDA reveals how ideological representations, social identities, and power relations shift, stabilise, or are contested across different historical or political periods. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|