Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Etnografía Lingüística× | Análisis del Discurso× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Lingüística | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1998 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Autor original≠ | Ben Rampton | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tipo≠ | Empirical process pipeline | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Rampton, B. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584-607. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Ethnographic Linguistics, Sociolinguistic Ethnography | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Relacionados | 2 | 2 |
| Resumen≠ | Linguistic Ethnography is a qualitative research approach combining ethnographic fieldwork with detailed linguistic analysis to understand language use in cultural context. Developed by researchers like Ben Rampton, it examines how people use language within communities, institutions, and social interactions while paying attention to identity, power, and meaning-making. This method integrates sociolinguistics, anthropology, and discourse analysis to produce rich, contextualized understandings of language-in-society. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|