Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis Interpretativo de la Conversación× | Análisis Crítico del Discurso× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Cualitativa | Cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1960s–1970s (CA); interpretive strand formalised 1990s–2000s | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| Autor original≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundations); interpretive extension by discourse scholars including Margaret Wetherell | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative discourse research design | Qualitative research method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412922271 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| Alias | ICA, interpretive CA, hermeneutic conversation analysis, qualitative conversation analysis | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Interpretive conversation analysis (ICA) examines how meaning is co-constructed turn by turn in talk, combining the micro-sequential rigour of classic conversation analysis with an explicitly interpretive stance. Rather than treating sequential organisation as the sole analytic object, ICA asks what participants are doing socially and discursively through their turns — what identities, institutional agendas, and power relations are built and contested in interaction. It draws on naturally occurring or recorded talk from social, institutional, or interview settings. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|