Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Análisis Fenomenológico Interpretativo× | Análisis Temático× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Investigación cualitativa | Investigación cualitativa |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1999 | 2006 |
| Autor original≠ | Jonathan A. Smith | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tipo | Method | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Smith, J. A. (1999). Towards a relational self: Social engagement during pregnancy and first-time motherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 409–426. DOI ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | IPA, Interpretative Phenomenology | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) is a qualitative research methodology that explores how people make sense of significant personal experiences. Developed by Jonathan Smith (1999) and grounded in phenomenology and hermeneutics, IPA examines individual experience in detail before identifying shared patterns; it emphasizes the idiographic (particular) and operates on the principle of double hermeneutics: the researcher interprets participants' interpretations of their lived experience. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|